Official Publication of the Minnesota State Bar Association


Vol. 62, No. 5| May/June 2005
Classifieds | Display Ads | Back to Contents

A New Playing Field:
Changes in the Rules of Bankruptcy

Whatever your perspective, it’s apparent that the new bankruptcy rules have altered the playing field and pose challenges that deserve the attention of debtors and creditors alike.

by George H. Singer and Michael P. Warren

On April 20, 2005, President Bush signed into law the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005,1 effecting the most comprehensive set of changes to the Bankruptcy Code since its enactment over 25 years ago.  The sheer volume of changed provisions makes the new law difficult to succinctly describe or intuitively grasp. Nevertheless, since the majority of provisions will take effect for cases filed 180 days after enactment (October 17, 2005), prompt awareness and understanding of the impending changes is imperative. Without attempting to provide an exhaustive analysis, this article will highlight some of the major amendments implemented by the new legislation and their anticipated impact on consumer and business bankruptcy cases.

Consumer Bankruptcy

The provisions in the new legislation addressing consumer bankruptcies have fundamentally changed the dynamic of the debtor-creditor relationship. The changes will likely curtail the number of bankruptcy filings and significantly impact prebankruptcy negotiations and recoveries, the relief available, and the ability of many individual debtors to obtain bankruptcy protection under Chapter 7. Now, there are many more hurdles. Creditors’ rights are strengthened. In short, consumers will find it more difficult under the new law to avail themselves of bankruptcy protection and rid themselves of debt. 

Credit Counseling. Under the amendments, all consumer debtors will now be required to obtain credit counseling in the form of a “briefing” from an approved nonprofit credit counseling agency, generally in advance of (and as a prerequisite to) any bankruptcy filing. [11 U.S.C. §109(h)]  The required briefing may take place on the telephone or the Internet, but must outline the opportunities for credit counseling and assist the debtor with a budgetary analysis and, possibly, the development of a repayment plan.  The amendments permit a bankruptcy court to reduce a creditor’s claim by up to 20 percent if the creditor “unreasonably” refused to negotiate a reasonable repayment plan proposed by the credit counseling agency that would provide for repayment of at least 60 percent of the debt over time. [Id. §502(k)]

Means Testing. A prerequisite to Chapter 7 relief under the new law is a more rigorous “means test” for determining eligibility.  The “means test” is designed to limit judicial discretion and deny access to Chapter 7 bankruptcy to those individuals who are deemed able to repay a portion of their debts.  The statute provides for either the dismissal or, with the debtor’s consent, the conversion of a Chapter 7 liquidation case to a Chapter 11 or Chapter 13 repayment plan upon a finding that the Chapter 7 filing is an “abuse.”  No longer is there a presumption of Chapter 7 availability.  A presumption of abuse arises if, after a prescribed analysis, an individual is deemed able to pay a specified portion of debt over five years. In order to rebut this presumption, the debtor will be required to demonstrate the existence of “special circumstances, such as a serious medical condition,” justifying adjustments of income or additional expenses and for which there is no “reasonable alternative.” Creditors will more often have the ability to challenge a debtor’s right to utilize Chapter 7.  The “means test” is not, however, applicable to debtors whose income is at or below the highest applicable state median income. [Id. §707(b)]

Post-Petition Performance. Eligible individual filers will also face new performance obligations under the law. Unless otherwise ordered by the court, debtors will be required to file (in addition to the list of creditors, schedule of assets and liabilities, income and expenses) tax returns, a certificate indicating that the debtor received certain information about bankruptcy, evidence of payment (if any) received from employers within 60 days before the filing, a statement of monthly net income and any anticipated increase in income or expenses after the filing, and other specified items. [See id. §§308, 521]  Failure to provide the required documents within 45 days after the petition has been filed (subject to the possibility of a 45-day extension) will result in the automatic dismissal of the bankruptcy case. [Id. §521(i)]

A debtor will also face more stringent performance obligations regarding his or her stated intentions (reaffirm, redeem or surrender) regarding personal property that secures a debt obligation.  A debtor will not be allowed to “retain” any personal property subject to a security interest unless the debtor either redeems the property (i.e., makes a lump sum payment) or enters into a reaffirmation agreement with respect to such property within 30 days of the first meeting of creditors as initially scheduled. [11 U.S.C. §§521(a)(2), (a)(6), 362(h)]2   A failure to timely act will result in the termination of the automatic stay (allowing the creditor to regain possession of the property) unless the court determines that the property is of “consequential value or benefit to the estate.”

Debtor Education Required.  The new legislation requires individual debtors in Chapter 7 and 13 cases to complete “an instructional course concerning personal financial management.” [Id. §§727(a)(10), 1328(g)] A discharge will be denied where the debtor failed to complete the required debtor education course, unless the United States Trustee had determined that there were no adequate instructional courses in the district.  This debtor education requirement is in addition to the credit counseling prerequisite highlighted above. 

Audits. The law will now subject individual debtors to random audits in Chapter 7 and Chapter 13 cases. The audits are designed to “determine the accuracy, veracity, and completeness of petitions, schedules, and other information” provided by the debtor.  A debtor’s discharge can be revoked if the debtor fails to cooperate with the auditor or fails to “explain satisfactorily” any “material misstatement.” [S.256 §603; 11 U.S.C. §727(d)(4)]

Exclusions and Exemptions.  The new law makes several significant changes relating to property of the estate and a consumer debtor’s ability to use bankruptcy provisions to shelter enumerated categories of property from the reach of creditors.

 Exclusions. The following types of property are added to the list of items that never become property of the bankruptcy estate: (1) certain funds placed in an education individual retirement account; (2) certain funds used to purchase a tuition credit under a qualified state tuition program; (3) amounts withheld from wages by an employer or received from an employee for payment of a contribution to an erisa-qualified plan, deferred compensation plan, tax-deferred annuity, or health insurance plan regulated by state law; and (4) an interest of the debtor in tangible personal property that is pawned. [11 U.S.C. §541(b)(5), (7), (8)]

 Residency Requirements. The Bankruptcy Code defines which state’s exemptions are available to a debtor by delineating certain domiciliary requirements.  The amendments change these requirements and impose new residency rules with respect to applicable exemption schemes.  Under the new legislation, the applicable state exemption law is governed by the state where the debtor has resided for 730 days (i.e., two years) preceding the filing (up from 180 days). If a debtor did not reside in any one state for 730 days, then the governing exemption law is that of the state where the debtor resided for 180 days immediately preceding the 730-day period (i.e., 2 1/2 years before filing) or for the longest portion of that 180-day period.  If a debtor does not satisfy any of the above, then the debtor may elect the federal exemptions. [Id. §522(b)(3)]

 Retirement Plans.  The list of exemptions is expanded to include retirement funds covered by various provisions of the Internal Revenue Code.  Significantly, this exemption is available to debtors irrespective of which exemption scheme (state or federal) is elected. iras and seps are capped at $1 million (without regard to rollover amounts). [Id. §522(b)(3)(C), (b)(4), (b)(12)]

 Lien Avoidance.  Significant exemption restrictions have also been imposed.  The Bankruptcy Code permits a debtor to avoid a nonpossessory, nonpurchase-money security interest on certain items of personal property, including “household goods,” to the extent that such lien interest impairs an exemption to which the debtor would otherwise be entitled.  The definition of “household goods” has been narrowed significantly to minimize such lien avoidance. [Id. §522(f)]

 State Homestead Exemptions.  The new legislation also operates to circumvent and preempt generous state homestead exemptions in certain circumstances. The homestead exemption (except for the principal residence of a family farmer) is limited to $125,000 of the interest that a debtor acquired in a principal residence within 1,215 days (approximately three years, four months) of the bankruptcy filing, unless the interest was transferred from another homestead in the same state. [Id. §522(p)]  Furthermore, the legislation places an absolute cap of $125,000 on the homestead exemption claimed in certain circumstances involving debtor fraud, tortious or criminal activity, except to the extent that the interest is determined to be reasonably necessary for the debtor’s support. [11 U.S.C. §522(q)(1)]  In addition, the new law provides that the debtor’s homestead exemption “shall be reduced” to the extent that the valuation of the homestead can be attributed to the disposition of nonexempt property within “ten years” of the bankruptcy filing and is made with an intent to hinder, delay or defraud any creditor. [Id. §522(o)]

 

Domestic Support Obligations. The new law bestows enhanced priority status upon certain domestic support obligations that were outstanding at the time of the filing.  Debt obligations owed to a spouse, former spouse, child, child’s parent, legal guardian, or responsible relative for alimony, maintenance or support will now be entitled to first priority subject only to claims for certain administrative expenses incurred by the trustee. [Id. §507(a)(1)]  In addition, any failure of an individual debtor to timely make all required payments in connection with a domestic support obligation becoming due and payable after the filing will be grounds for dismissal or conversion of a Chapter 13 bankruptcy case. [Id. §1307(c)]

Reaffirmation Agreements. The legislation sets forth extensive (and specific) new requirements relating to the disclosure by creditors of information to consumer debtors in connection with the reaffirmation of prepetition debt. [Id. §524] The amendments are designed to prevent abusive tactics and limit the hardship that reaffirmation can impose on debtors.  A court may disapprove of a reaffirmation agreement that imposes an “undue hardship.” A presumption of undue hardship arises if, for the period extending through 60 days after the agreement is filed, the debtor’s expenses plus the payment on the reaffirmed debt exceed monthly income. Debtor’s counsel will be required to certify that they have fully explained the effect of reaffirmation to the debtor and that the agreement was entered into voluntarily. Furthermore, debtor’s counsel must certify that the reaffirmation agreement does not impose an undue hardship, or that in the opinion of the attorney, the debtor has the ability to make the requisite payments.  Credit unions are exempted from some of the new restrictions on reaffirmation agreements.

Creditor Notice. Notice to creditors will no longer be effective unless it is given at the address supplied by the creditor in two written communications within 90 days of the bankruptcy and includes the account number furnished. [11 U.S.C. §342]  No monetary penalty for violating the automatic stay or for failing to turn over property can be now assessed unless the conduct forming the basis of any violation occurs after the creditor receives effective notice. [Id. §§342, 362(k)]

Attorney Accountability. Attorneys representing individual debtors are now subject to greater responsibilities in connection with the filing and administering of a bankruptcy case. The heightened requirements include an obligation to verify information contained in the debtor’s bankruptcy schedules. In addition, attorneys are required to certify that they have performed a reasonable investigation as to the circumstances giving rise to the bankruptcy and have no knowledge that any information in the schedules and other documents filed with the court is incorrect.  Attorneys will also be subject to increased disclosure and record-keeping requirements as “debt relief agencies.”  As a result of the increased responsibilities and accompanying increased chance for sanctions, fines and penalties, pro bono programs may face increased challenges in garnering volunteer participation. [Id. §707(b)(4); Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9011]

Discharge Narrowed. The discharge is at the heart of consumer bankruptcy. The discharge was designed to implement the “fresh start” principles that pervaded the original enactment of the Bankruptcy Code.  Since promulgation of the Code in 1978, policy-based justifications have resulted in amendments aimed at narrowing the scope of the bankruptcy discharge and the relief afforded.  The new legislation further (and significantly) limits a consumer debtor’s ability to dispose of prepetition debt.  Following is a list of some of the more notable amendments directly affecting the discharge: 

 Family Law Property Settlements. The law is amended to render nondischargeable in Chapter 7 cases all property settlement obligations (i.e., those not actually in the nature of support) arising in connection with a separation agreement, divorce decree, order of a court, or other obligations resulting from a determination made by a governmental unit in accordance with state law. [11 U.S.C. §523(a)(15), (c)]

 Student Loans. The student loan exception from discharge is amended to extend nondischargeability to student loans issued by profit and nongovernmental organizations.  In the absence of “undue hardship,” student loans are now essentially nondischargeable, without regard to the nature of the lender. [Id. §523(a)(8)]

 Credit Card Fraud Debts. The Bankruptcy Code currently renders certain consumer purchases of “luxury goods and services” on credit and “cash advances” incurred shortly before a debtor’s bankruptcy filing presumptively fraudulent and nondischargeable.  This presumption of nondischargeability for credit card charges is now expanded.  Under the new law, the threshold triggering the presumption is reduced from $1,225 to $50 for “luxury goods” and from $1,225 to $750 for cash advances.  The prepetition look-back period for which such threshold-meeting charges or cash advances are deemed to be presumptively fraudulent has also been extended in order to capture more debt. [Id. §523(a)(2)(C)]

 DUI Obligations. The provision rendering nondischargeable debts for personal injury or death arising from the debtor’s operation of a “motor vehicle” while intoxicated has been expanded to include the operation of a “vessel” and “aircraft” while under the influence. [Id. §523(a)(9)]

 Pension Plan Loans. The new law renders loan balances owed on certain qualified pension, profit sharing, stock bonus or similar retirement plans nondischargeable.  The withholding of amounts from a debtor’s wages and collection of any amount withheld pursuant to an “agreement” with the debtor is also excepted from the automatic stay. [Id. §523(a)(18)]

 Superdischarge” Limited.  The generous discharge available under current Chapter 13 (the “superdischarge”) has been narrowed to exclude debts for (a) certain types of taxes; (b) fraud, including credit card abuse; (c) failure to schedule debts to permit the timely assertion of claims; (d) embezzlement, larceny and breach of fiduciary duty; and (e) restitution or damages awarded in a civil action as a result of a willful or malicious injury causing death or personal injury.  Domestic support payments, student loans, dui injuries, and criminal restitution still remain excepted from the scope of the discharge as under former law.  The few obligations still covered by the Chapter 13 superdischarge include debts for “willful and malicious injury” not referenced above, and debts arising from property settlements awarded in connection with a divorce or separation proceeding. [Id. §1328(a)]

 Repeat Filings.  A debtor will also be denied a Chapter 7 discharge if the debtor received a prior discharge under that chapter within the last eight years (up from six under prior law).  A discharge will be denied in Chapter 13 if the debtor obtained a discharge in Chapter 7, 11 or 12 within four years, or in a Chapter 13 within the last two years. [Id. §§727(a)(8), 1328(f)] It should also be noted that the automatic stay provisions of the Bankruptcy Code are amended to provide that if a Chapter 7, 11 or 13 (but not Chapter 12) case is filed by an individual within one year of the dismissal of an earlier bankruptcy case (except where the later case is re-filed in another chapter after a dismissal of a Chapter 7 case based on the means test), the automatic stay in the subsequent case automatically terminates “30 days” after the second filing unless a party in interest (including the debtor) affirmatively demonstrates (before the expiration of the 30-day period) that the instant case was filed in good faith with respect to the creditors sought to be stayed. [11 U.S.C. §362(c)(3)]

 

Chapter 13 Changes. The rules for Chapter 13 have likewise changed.  As summarized above, the superdischarge is significantly minimized.  Most Chapter 13 plans will be five-year commitments (rather than three years as under former law).  Chapter 13 debtors will also be faced with new obstacles with respect to secured debt. An individual debtor will not be able to strip down secured debt (1) of any kind if the obligation was incurred during the one-year period preceding the bankruptcy filing, or (2) if the collateral consists of a purchase-money security interest in a motor vehicle that was purchased within “910 days” of the bankruptcy filing (i.e., two days less than 2 1/2 years) and acquired for “personal use.” [Id. §1325(a)(5)]  Furthermore, a Chapter 13 debtor will now be precluded from providing for the release of a creditor’s lien in the plan upon payment of only the stripped-down secured claim over the creditor’s objection.  Rather, the plan must provide that the lien of the secured creditor “be retained” until the full amount of the claim is paid or the plan is completed. [Id.]

Business Reorganizations

The new legislation makes significant changes to the dynamics of business reorganizations under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code.  Though these changes have received little media attention, their importance and impact on the direction of many business bankruptcy cases are no less significant.

Exclusivity Limited. Under the current Bankruptcy Code, the debtor has the “exclusive” right to file a plan of reorganization for the first 120 days of a bankruptcy case, and the exclusive right to solicit votes in favor of the plan for the first 180 days.  Since no other party can propose a plan during this period of exclusivity, the debtor has significant leverage in plan negotiations.  Courts in a number of jurisdictions have routinely granted extensions to the debtor’s exclusivity periods.  Under the new law, the court will not be permitted to extend the debtor’s exclusivity periods for filing a plan and obtaining acceptances beyond 18 months and 20 months after the filing, respectively. (Somewhat different rules apply for a “small business” debtor). [Id. §1121(d)]

Small Business Bankruptcies. Congress has departed from the “one-size-fits-all” approach to business reorganizations.  The new legislation creates a special set of rules for “small business” cases, defined as those involving a business with debts of $2 million or less, not including debts owed to affiliates and insiders. [See, e.g., id. §§101(51C), 51(D), 1121(e), 1125(f); 28 U.S.C. §546(a)(7), (8)]  The amendments attempt to reduce cost and delay and increase debtor accountability in small business reorganizations. The changes streamline the time frames and process for plan preparation, filing and confirmation.  Additional reporting requirements and other duties are now imposed on qualifying debtors so that cases in which a successful reorganization is improbable can be more quickly identified. [11 U.S.C. §1116]

Dismissal or Conversion Required. Congress recognized that many Chapter 11 cases have no meaningful prospect of reorganization.  The new legislation therefore contains a number of provisions that operate to significantly expand the grounds under which a Chapter 11 case can be (and will required to be) dismissed or converted to a Chapter 7 proceeding. [Id. §1112]

Key Employee Retention Plans. The amendments significantly restrict the ability of Chapter 11 business debtors to implement arrangements, typically known as Key Employee Retention Programs (“kerps”), under which a select group of executives and other personnel deemed valuable to the business are paid bonuses as an incentive to remain with the company.  Under the new law, there must be a showing that, among other things, the particular employee is “essential to the survival of the business.”  The amendments also limit the amount of payments that can be made for the purpose of “inducing” an insider to remain with the business and impose additional restrictions on the debtor’s ability to utilize incentive, severance, bonus and other retention programs. [Id. §503(c)]

Preferential Transfer Rules. A number of the recent amendments affect a trustee’s ability to recover preferential transfers, including changes that will (1) make it potentially easier for creditors to establish the “ordinary course of business” defense; (2) allow creditors “30 days” to perfect their purchase-money security interests (rather than 20 days); (3) preclude lawsuits seeking to recover relatively small sums (less than $5,000) from creditors; and (4) require lawsuits seeking to collect a consumer debt of less than $15,000, or any other non-insider debt less than $10,000, to be brought in the district where the defendant is located (rather than in a foreign venue where the bankruptcy is pending). [Id. §547(c); 28 U.S.C. §1409]

Fraudulent Transfer Rules. In an attempt to thwart excessive prebankruptcy compensation arrangements, the new law modifies the fraudulent transfer rules to expressly provide for the recovery of certain payments made to or for the benefit of insiders under an employment contract prior to the bankruptcy filing. [Id. §548(a)(1) and (2)] Moreover, the look-back period for determining what transfers can be avoided has been extended to two years (as opposed to one year under former law) for all transfers deemed fraudulent by the Bankruptcy Code. 

Sellers of Goods Protected. The new legislation enhances reclamation rights by lengthening from ten days to 45 days the deadline within which sellers of goods can demand to reclaim goods delivered to buyers. Furthermore, if the 45-day period extends beyond the petition date, then the new deadline for receipt of the reclamation demand is 20 days following the bankruptcy filing. [11 U.S.C. §546(c)]  A creditor will also have a priority claim for the value of all goods shipped on credit in the ordinary course and that were received within 20 days of a buyer’s bankruptcy filing.  This new priority will be given without regard to whether the creditor made a timely reclamation demand. [Id. §503(b)(9)]

Real Estate Leases. Chapter 11 debtors now have new limits placed on their ability to determine whether to assume or reject their obligations under unexpired leases of commercial property.  Courts, recognizing the magnitude of liability associated with assumption, routinely allowed debtors to postpone their decisions with respect to real estate leases for an extended period of time.  The new legislation deems all commercial real estate leases rejected (with immediate surrender of the premises required) if not specifically assumed within 210 days of the case, absent the consent of the landlord. [Id. §365(d)(4)]

Chapter 12 Bankruptcies. The new law makes Chapter 12 of the Bankruptcy Code, which now applies to “family fishermen” as well as “family farmers,” permanent.  The debt limits and other tests for determining eligibility have been liberalized under the new legislation to allow more farmers (and fishermen) to obtain relief under this chapter. [Id. §§101(18), (19), (19A), (19B), 109(f)] 

Conclusion

In myriad ways, only some of which could be covered in this article, this legislation will change the ability of consumer and business debtors to leverage the bankruptcy system in an effort to escape or minimize their obligations. While consumer debtors have been granted additional protections for certain types of property in the form of new exemptions and exclusions, they will also be faced with many new obstacles. The “fresh start” is no longer what it used to be.  For businesses, a streamlined process and enhanced creditors’ rights will operate to deny many companies rights formerly available in a reorganization case. For creditors, the legislation provides increased protections and fashions new rights.  The new rules of bankruptcy have changed the field for all players and should be given careful attention. o 

Notes
1 S.256, 109th Cong., 1st Sess. (04/20/05); Pub. L. No. 109-8.

2 The debtor may have up to “45 days” from the meeting of creditors to perform if the loan is a purchase-money obligation. See 11 U.S.C. §521(i).


How will the new bankruptcy bill affect your practice?  Watch upcoming editions of Legal News Digest, MSBA’s members-only email newsletter, for related news and
opportunities to post your observations on this and other timely topics.


GEORGE H. SINGER is a partner at Lindquist & Vennum PLLP, practicing in the areas of corporate and commercial law. He served as an attorney on staff with the National Bankruptcy Review Commission.

MICHAEL P. WARREN
, an associate at Lindquist & Vennum PLLP, practices in the areas of corporate, commercial and bankruptcy law.  He is a graduate of the University of St. Thomas School of Law.